Video of Dennis Price speaking about his book
More and more people are writing to me about my book The Missing Years of Jesus, and the vast majority have had nothing but praise and kind words for it. I appreciate this very much and I’m glad that so many people are enjoying reading it, while I’m far less concerned about anyone agreeing with my conclusions.
I made this short video a few years ago with the kind assistance of my friend Frank Somers, so for those of you who haven’t see it, it gives you some idea of who I am. It also contains a brief description of my book, but you can find more details about this publication elsewhere on this site. These details can be found on the static page bearing the title of my book, while there’s also a page giving a preview of the book’s foreword and another with reviews.
I’ve written numerous posts on the subject of the ‘missing years’ of Jesus since my book was published. Some deal with new information that’s come in since publication, while others simply refer to or mention some aspect of this mystery, but you can find them all on the right-hand side of this site in the AD 12 – 30 category.
Thank you for visiting my site. If you’ve read my book, then I simply hope you’ve enjoyed it and thank you for buying it.
.png)
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
Watched you by chance this morning on Gardiner’s World – immediately struck by your tone of voice – continued watching. Fascinated by your discoveries – I’ll get your book – read lots along similar lines since my conversion FROM Christianity – (on my blog). It is a travesty that our true history has been manipulated and many scholars refuse to acknowledge that we have been ‘lied’ to – and so the deceit continues. I hope I’m not being too fanciful when I say that this cover-up and denial, fostered by the ‘church’, is to prevent us from seeing who and what we really are… Another story… which I am attempting to write about…Then there’s crop circles…!
Hello Poppy,
Thank you for taking the time and the trouble to write in. It’s difficult to listen to oneself and to be objective, but perhaps my tone of voice during the interview with Phil Gardiner was notably different from the tone in the recent BBC interview, as I’d been awake for much longer.
As for the other things you mention, the simple truth is that I do not know for a fact that JC existed, but on balance, I’m inclined to think he did. I’ve spent some years now, looking into the seemingly vexed question of his ‘missing years’, and I’ve yet to find a shred of persuasive evidence that he was anywhere other than what is now the West of England and South Wales during this time. I’ve gone into all this before now on several occasions here on Eternal Idol, while every now and again, some new piece of information comes in, but there are a great many informed discussions here about early Christianity in Britain if you care to look.
Given that there’s zero evidence for JC being anywhere else and in my view, a great deal of persuasive and thought-provoking evidence that he was here in Britain, I often wondered why the ‘church’ didn’t take far more of an interest in this matter. I long ago concluded that it was because any stay in Britain by JC in ancient times logically means that he was on warm terms with the heathen locals, which would be perfectly in keeping with what we know of his character and disposition, because he was on warm terms with just about everyone he ever met, apparently, even Romans, with the notable exception of many of the priesthood in his own country.
For what it’s worth, that’s my take on the matter, but I’m really not concerned either way. However, as I mentioned in passing during my interview with Trevor Fry, I’m aware that a many people around the world are intrigued by these West Country legends, so I’m sure that the region and the populace would benefit greatly if they were better known. Glastonbury notably benefits from the legends of King Arthur, whether they’re rooted in truth or not, so I ask myself “Where’s the harm?” in the legends of JC in Britain being better known and discussed.